The tax treatment of RRSPs on an annuitant’s death is something that often confuses (and perplexes) beneficiaries of an estate. I’ve seen more than one situation where the residual beneficiaries of an estate are distressed to find out that the estate is picking up the tax bill for an RRSP being transferred to a named beneficiary…the argument being that they, as residual beneficiaries, should not have to pay taxes associated with funds be transferred to someone else.
The general rule is that absent a tax-deferred rollover (more on that in a minute), the fair market value of the RRSP on the annuitant’s death is treated as income and must be included in the annuitant’s terminal return (tax return that is filed for the year of death).
As noted above, there are a couple of situations where the taxes associated with an RRSP can be avoided by the estate. The first is where the designated beneficiary is the annuitant’s spouse or common law partner; the other is where the beneficiary is the annuitant’s financially dependent child or grandchild.
Where the beneficiary is a spouse and a physically/mentally infirm child or grandchild, the RRSP can be rolled-over to the beneficiary. Where the beneficiary is a minor child or grandchild (who isn’t infirm) the proceeds of the RRSP can be used to purchase an annuity that will make payments annually until the minor has reached 18 (with such payments being taxed). However, if the children/grandchildren are over 18 and not infirm no tax deferral will be available.
It is worth noting that the tax liability the estate might incur is related only to the value of the RRSP on the annuitant’s death. Once the recipient starts withdrawing funds, s/he will be liable for the tax, not the estate.
If you want to know more about the tax treatment of RRSPs on death, check out the Canada Revenue Agency’s memorandum on the issue.
Have a great day!
Megan F. Connolly
Tags: Beneficiary Designations, RRSPs/Insurance Policies An Annuity by Will Posted on January 27, 2009 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Annuities are often employed when an individual plans his or her estate. We have covered different aspects of annuities on past blogs on Hull on Estates.
A testator, for example, may choose to have one child’s portion of the future estate placed into an annuity that will create a flow of money over time. The child would have access to the cash flow, but not necessarily access to the principal amount.
In September 2008, Gayle Reid applied to the Superior Court of Justice for an interpretation. The claimant’s father, Bernard Wiesberg, died and left an annuity to his friend, Avonne Richter (also identified as his common-law spouse). Minimum annual payments of the annuity were directed in the Will to Ms. Richter who received them from 2003 through to 2007.
The Applicant was to receive the residue of her father’s estate. A 2005 Order by Dandie J. required Ms. Richter to designate Ms. Reid as the beneficiary. (A provision of the Income Tax Act required the beneficiary to be named, otherwise the retirement income fund would have collapsed, defeating the testator's intent.)
The issue arose when Ms. Richter, who received the previous annual annuity payments in arrears up to 2006, chose to take the $17,015.57 payment in January, in advance for that year. Ms. Richter died on April 17, 2007.
The Applicant sought an interpretation of her father’s Will, specifically regarding the annual payments. As the payments were for the “lifetime” of Ms. Richter, the Estate owed $12,027.44 to the Applicant because the Court reasoned that calculations must be made to the date of Ms. Richter’s death. Therefore a pro-rata calculation was “the only reasonable and fair manner to ensure the two gifts in the Will are honoured.”
If the annuity had been paid in arrears that December, Ms. Richter’s Estate would have been owed a pro-rata amount of the annuity for that year calculated to the date of her death.
Have a good day.
Jonathan
Tags: Beneficiary Designations, Common Law Spouses, Estate Planning, Hull on Estates, Jonathan, Morse, Reid, Richter, Trustees, annuity, beneficiary, designation, pro-rata, will Tax Free Savings Accounts and Beneficiary Designations Posted on January 7, 2009 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Starting last week, any resident of Canada over the age of 18 with a valid social insurance number can open up a tax-free savings account (TFSA) and make a contribution of up to $5,000 a year. Income earned inside a TFSA is not taxable and money can be withdrawn tax-free at any time. Click here to read a National Post article on TFSAs and what type of assets can be held within a TFSA.
When TFSAs were first introduced in the Federal Government’s 2008 budget, there were concerns with how TFSAs would be treated upon the death of the account holder. TFSAs allow account holders to name a spouse or a common law partner as a “successor account holder” to allow the successor account holder to maintain the TFSA of the deceased without a reduction in their own contributions. Upon death, the value of the TFSA is not included in income but any income that accrues after death is subject to tax.
However, the federal government likely lacks the jurisdiction to give effect to successor account holder designations without also be named in testamentary documents and requiring probate. Beneficiary designations to allow assets to pass outside of probate are within the domain of provincial jurisdiction and the provincial legislation needs to be amended to allow for TFSA designations similar to RRSP beneficiary designations.
Currently, many Ontario financial institutions are providing for both a beneficiary designation and successor account holder be named when a TFSA is opened. The big unanswered question is if probate will be required or if a TFSA is an asset that passes outside of the estate.
Once the issue of beneficiary designations is settled, TFSAs may become another estate planning tool.
Have a great day,
Diane Vieira
Tags: Beneficiary Designations, Blog, TFSA, successor account holder Guardianship in Canada - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Posted on December 9, 2008 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to Guardianship in Canada
This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Suzana Popovic-Montag speaks with Rodney Hull about how the law has changed in Canada as it pertains to the appointment of guardians. Rodney suggests that today's laws (post-1994) are clearer than they were in the past.
If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.
Continue Reading... Tags: PODCASTS / AUDIO, PODCASTS / TRANSCRIBED, TOPICS, Beneficiary Designations, Capacity, Estate & Trust, Ethical Issues, Hull & Hull LLP, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Rodney Hull, Show notes, Suzana Popovic-Montag, canada, gifts, guardians, guardianship, history, hull and hull LLP, ian hull The Benefits of the Family Meeting - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning #141 Posted on December 3, 2008 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to The Benefits of the Family Meeting
This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Suzana Popovic-Montag speaks with Rodney Hull about the benefits of holding a family meeting to discuss estate matters while the testator is still alive. They both extend their condolences to the family of Ted Rogers, who passed away today.
If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.
Tags: PODCASTS / AUDIO, PODCASTS / TRANSCRIBED, TOPICS, Beneficiary Designations, Estate & Trust, Family Conference Meeting, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Hull on Estates and Succession Planning, Rodney Hull, Show notes, Suzana Popovic-Montag, Ted Rogers, the Family Conference Rose v. Rose - Hull on Estates #139 Posted on December 2, 2008 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to Rose v. Rose
This week on Hull on Estates, Rodney Hull and Jonathan Morse discuss the case of Rose v. Rose [which can be found at 24ETR(3D)217 or 81OR(3D)349]. The case is valuable and instructive as it raises questions about rectification, rescissionand removal of the trustees.
Feel free to send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com or leave us a comment on the Hull on Estates blog.
Continue Reading... Tags: PODCASTS / AUDIO, PODCASTS / TRANSCRIBED, TOPICS, Beneficiary Designations, Estate & Trust, Hull and Hull, Hull on Estates, Hull on Estates, Jonathan Morse, Rodney Hull, Rose v. Rose, Show notes Direct and Indirect Approaches to Estate Planning - Part 1 Posted on November 25, 2008 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to Direct and Indirect Approaches to Estate Planning - Part 1
This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana start a discussion on their global philosophy toward the estate planning process. There are direct and indirect approaches to capacity and estate planning and in this episode, Ian and Suzana explore these approaches as they pertain to the choice of attorney.
If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.
Continue Reading... Tags: PODCASTS / AUDIO, PODCASTS / TRANSCRIBED, TOPICS, Beneficiary Designations, Capacity, Estate & Trust, Executors and Trustees, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Hull on Estates and Succession Planning, Litigation, Show notes, Suzana Popovic-Montag, direct, estate planning, global, hybrid capacity, ian hull, indirect, philosophy, process The Interrelationship Between a Guardian of Property and a Trustee Under a Testamentary Trust - Hull on Estates Podcast # 133 Posted on October 21, 2008 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to:
The Interrelationship Between a Guardian of Property and a Trustee Under a Testamentary Trust
This week on Hull on Estates, Rick Bickhram and David M. Smith discuss the complications that can arise when an incapable person is both the subject of a guardianship order and the beneficiary of a testamentary trust.
Comments? Send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com, call us on the comment line at 206-350-6636, or leave us a comment on the Hull on Estates blog.
Continue Reading... Tags: PODCASTS / AUDIO, PODCASTS / TRANSCRIBED, TOPICS, Beneficiary Designations, Capacity, David M. Smith, Estate & Trust, Hull on Estates, Hull on Estates, Rick Bickhram, Show notes, beneficiary, guardianship, testamentary trust Tax Treatment of RRSPs on an Annuitant's Death Posted on February 20, 2008 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
With the deadline for RRSP contributions right around the corner, I thought it would be worthwhile to review the tax treatment of RRSPs on an annuitant’s death.
Generally speaking, when an annuitant dies, the fair market value of the RRSP is attributed to the annuitant’s income during his or her final year of life and must be included on the terminal return. The result is that an RRSP will be generally taxed in the hands of the deceased.
However, there are exceptions to this rule. The estate can avoid paying the taxes on an RRSP if the following are the beneficiaries:
a) The annuitant’s spouse or common-law partner; or
b) The annuitant’s dependant child or grandchild.
The tax implications for the above beneficiaries vary. If the beneficiary is the spouse, common-law partner, or a dependant child or grandchild with a physical or mental infirmity, then tax can be delayed by transferring the funds to an RRSP or RRIF.
A dependant child or grandchild (with no infirmity) has the option of staggering the tax consequences by purchasing an annuity that matures no later than his or her 18th birthday.
However you choose to deal with your RRSPs when planning your estate, it is always a good idea to talk with your estate planner about the tax implications of any designations you are making.
For more information, check out the Canada Revenue Agency’s memo on the “Death of an RRSP Annuitant”.
Thanks for reading,
Megan F. Connolly
Tags: Beneficiary Designations The Core Issues Concerning Estate Taxes - Hull on Estates and Succession Planning Podcast # 91 Posted on December 18, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to The Core Issues Concerning Estate Taxes
This week on Hull on Estates and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana discuss the core issues surrounding estate taxes. Continue Reading... Tags: PODCASTS / AUDIO, Beneficiary Designations, Capital Gains Tax, Dave Jones, Deferring Tax, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Inside PR, Social Media, Terry Fallis, US citizenship, US estate taxes, last to die policies, probate fee tax, roll over, rolling assets into trust, trust environments Hall v McLaughlin - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Podcast #71 Posted on July 31, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to "Hall v McLaughlin"
Read the transcribed version of "Hall v McLaughlin"
This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana discuss the case of Hall v McLaughlin. This case explores the issue of whether or not a mirror/mutual will written early in life is binding. It illustrates the importance of making your intentions clear to your spouse.
Click "Continue Reading" for the transcribed version of this podcast. Continue Reading... Tags: PODCASTS / AUDIO, PODCASTS / TRANSCRIBED, Beneficiary Designations, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Breaking the Ties Posted on April 17, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Yesterday I reviewed the decision of Holmes Estate (Re) [2007] B.C.J. No. 45. You will recall that a gift in the testator’s Will to “all my nieces and nephews” was interpreted in the circumstances to mean a bequest to the children of the testator’s siblings including the 18 nieces and nephews of the testator’s late wife.
One such niece, Patricia Meadows, had been married to Alfie Meadows. Alfie was seeking entitlement to a share in the residue of the estate belonging to Patricia, who had died before the testator. He was doing so on the basis of the language contained in the Will that if any of the testator’s nieces or nephews predeceased him, that person’s share was to be paid to their surviving spouse.
The problem for Alfie was that he had been convicted of Patricia’s murder! The Court quite justly denied Alfie entitlement to Patricia’s share in the estate by applying the general rule of public policy that a person is precluded from benefiting from a crime.
The irony in this case is that while Alfie’s crime didn’t pay for him, it did benefit the surviving nieces and nephews, as the gift was a class gift (when a member of the class is disqualified their share is divided amongst the remaining members).
While this case made for an interesting read, I can only hope that the decision will help deter similar claims from arising again.
Have a good day,
Natalia Angelini
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Estate Litigation, class gift, estate law blog, extended family Breach of Trust - Criminal Penalties Posted on April 3, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Yesterday I suggested that criminal charges in Estates, capacity and trust cases might become more common.
In R. v. Bunn (2000), C.C.C. (3d) 505, the Supreme Court of Canada considered the sentencing of a Manitoba lawyer convicted of converting some $86,000 worth of trust monies to his own use. The accused acted as attorney for property for Soviet/Russian beneficiaries of Manitoba and Saskatchewan estates. He received monies in trust, but instead of paying it all to the beneficiaries, he redirected some of it to himself.
This conduct was discovered by the Law Society of Manitoba when conducting a spot audit of the accused. The accused was disbarred. Some compassion may be warranted: the accused cared for a disabled wife, was the sole income earner in the family, suffered financial woes for years, and lost his reputation and 20-year law career.
At trial the accused was sentenced to two years in a federal penitentiary, but the Manitoba Court of Appeal substituted a conditional sentence of two years less a day.
The Supreme Court of Canada, in a 5-3 decision, upheld the Appeal decision. The majority decided that the need for restorative justice and the benefits of reducing prison terms outweighed the minority’s desire to denounce the accused and promote general deterrence.
Lawyers tend to be easier targets in these cases because of the need to establish mens rea (the intent to commit a crime). It would be difficult for any competent lawyer to claim ignorance of proper usage of trust monies, but laypersons may be a different matter.
Thanks for reading.
Sean Graham
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Ethical Issues Estate Planning Considerations in the Context of Married and Unmarried Spouses - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Podcast #54 Posted on April 3, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to "Estate Planning Considerations in the Context of Married and Unmarried Spouses"
Read the transcribed version of "Estate Planning Considerations in the Context of Married and Unmarried Spouses"
During Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Episode #54, Ian and Suzana discuss how to avoid Will drafting problems when creating beneficiary designations for insurance trusts.
They also discuss the importance of including funeral arrangements in your Will, and the various Provincial approaches to the revocation of wills after marriage and after a divorce.
Tags: Beneficiary Designations, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Podcast #53 - Beneficiary Designation Considerations for Spousal Trusts Posted on March 27, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to "Beneficiary Designation Considerations for Spousal Trusts"
Read the transcribed version of "Beneficiary Designation Considerations for Spousal Trusts"
During Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Episode #53, Ian Hull and Suzana Popovic-Montag build on their last podcast regarding succession planning for married couples, and turn their focus to spousal trusts.
They discuss administrative expenses surrounding trusts, the circumstances that lead to surviving spouse litigation, and methods for ensuring the balance between beneficiary designations.
Tags: Beneficiary Designations, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Don't be so literal! The importance of Testamentary Intent Posted on March 21, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
In a recent decision out of Québec, Broodney v. Herzog [2006] Q.J. No. 14933, testamentary intent trumped the literal wording of a Will.
The testator had been involved in a loving relationship with Harry Broodney. They had lived together for twelve years. In a 1995 Will, the testator left Harry $25,000.00. In a 1998 Codicil, the gift was increased to $35,000.00, payable in monthly instalments of $600.00. In 1999, the testator executed a further Codicil, increasing the monthly payments to $1,000.00 but not changing the capital amount of the gift. Both the 1995 Will and the 1998 Codicil stated that the gift to Harry would lapse and be null and void, if he and the testator were “not living together” at the time of the latter’s death.
The issue for the Court of Québec was the meaning of the phrase “not living together”. At the time of the testator’s death, she had been living in a nursing home due to her deteriorating health. Her family consequently claimed that Harry was not entitled to the $35,000.00 gift.
The Court focused on the testator’s intentions. Her intent to benefit Harry was clear and uncontested. The Court held that the testator intended the phrase “not living together” to mean a “break up” with Harry. The evidence was clear that their loving relationship did not end when the testator involuntarily left Harry to reside in the nursing home. The evidence was also clear that the testator’s family was aware of the loving relationship. For the Court, the inability to physically live together could not be a reason for disinheriting Harry.
Not surprisingly, Harry asked for and received punitive damages as a result of the family’s refusal to honour the testator’s last wishes. The Court deemed the family’s refusal to be malicious and reckless.
The litigation could have been avoided by better wording in the Will. Drafting issues aside, the case is a good illustration of a Court employing common sense and testamentary intent to avoid an unjust result.
Have a great day!
Bianca
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Court of Quebec, Estate Litigation, Ethical Issues, Testamentary Intent, Will Drafting Dependant Support Claims and Joint Insurance Policies Posted on March 21, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Section 72(1) of Ontario’s Succession Law Reform Act allows a court to deem various assets that may normally fall outside of a deceased’s estate, to be part of the estate for the purposes of satisfying a dependant support claim. This usually includes “any amount payable under a policy of insurance effected on the life of the deceased and owned by him or her”. However, as demonstrated in Madore-Ogilvie (Litigation Guardian of) v. Ogilvie Estate [2006] E.G. No. 4654 (Div. Ct.), this provision will not normally capture insurance policies owned jointly by the deceased and a third party.
In Ogilvie Estate, the deceased was the father of six children (three of them minors) by five different women. Dependant support claims were made on behalf of two of the minor children. It was agreed that the deceased had failed to provide adequately for his minor children.
The issue before the court was whether a joint life insurance policy, issued to both the deceased and his spouse, could be included as part of the deceased’s estate under section 72(1) of the SLRA. The deceased and his spouse were both the owners and beneficiaries of the policy, which provided that the survivor of the two would receive the face amount of the policy on the death of the other. It was undisputed that the spouse had made the majority of the payments under the policy.
The applications judge held that the policy could be included as part of the estate. On appeal, a majority of the Divisional Court reversed this decision. The majority held that a jointly owned policy cannot be included as part of an estate merely because the deceased is one of the owners of the policy. The Court recognized that s. 72 of the SLRA was designed to counter the intentional depletion of an estate at the expense of dependants. However, there are transactions that “would be considered the normal personal commerce of an individual” and not necessarily undertaken to disenfranchise a dependant. In the case at hand, the majority ultimately decided that the contractual rights of the spouse to the joint policy trumped the needs of the deceased’s dependants.
Have a great day!
Bianca
Tags: Ontario's Succession Law Reform Act, Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Dependant Support Claims, Elder Law Insurance Issues, Estate Litigation, Joint Insurance Policies, Ontario Divisional Court, estate law Will Interpretation Problems and the Residue of an Estate Posted on March 13, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Yesterday, we set out the first of a series of interpretation problems identified by Rodney Hull, Q.C. that often arise in Wills. Today, we set out another common provision that tends to cause difficulty …
(1) THE RULE IN SAUNDERS v. VAUTIER (1841), Cr. & Ph. 240.
(2) THE CLAUSE - “The residue of my estate to A upon attaining age twenty-five years”.
(3) THE FACTS - A is nineteen years of age on testator’s death. There is no gift over in the event that A dies before attaining the age of twenty-five years.
(4) THE QUESTION -
(a) Is the gift:
(i) vested in possession?
(ii) vested in interest?
(iii) vested subject to being divested? or
(iv) contingent?
(b) When can A call for the gift?
(5) WHERE TO START RESEARCH -
(i) Theobald on Wills - page 603 - paragraphs 43 - 29.
(ii) Feeney’s Canadian Law of Wills, paragraphs 17.54 - 17.55.
(iii) Sheard, Hull and Fitzpatrick, Canadian Forms of Wills, page 214.
Interpretation Applications can be quite expensive and time consuming. To the extent that they can be avoided, with diligent research and the ultimate consent of the beneficiaries, together with the consent of the Public Guardian and Trustee and the Children’s Lawyer, if necessary, this may not be a bad thing!
All the best – Suzana.
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Executors and Trustees The Search for Lost Art Posted on March 8, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Sometimes an estate trustee may get more than she bargained for.
A case in point may arise when an estate has entitlement to various pieces of artwork in an assortment of jurisdictions. How does the estate trustee locate the artwork? What constitute sufficient efforts to locate such assets? How is it valued?
All of these questions raise significant issues for the estate trustee. The advent of the internet has provided new tools to anyone making a global search for artwork. The Lost Art Internet Database is such an example. This website is a project of the German government’s central office for the recovery of lost art. Not surprisingly, a large share of such art was seized from Jewish owners by the Nazis.
In all likelihood, the estate trustee of the estate of the late Max Stern has had recourse to this website in an effort to locate lost assets to which the estate is entitled. As recently reported in the Toronto Star, the late Max Stern was the owner of an art gallery in Germany from 1913 until 1934 when he was forced to sell his holdings by the Third Reich. He escaped to Montreal in 1937 where he set up an art gallery. Upon his death in 1987, Stern named Concordia University, McGill University, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem as the beneficiaries of his estate. The estate trustee, operating as the Max Stern Art Restitution Project, has since located many pieces originally stolen from Stern’s German gallery.
Until tomorrow,
David
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiaries, Beneficiary Designations, Executors and Trustees, Max Stern, Max Stern Art Restitution Project, The Lost Art Database Hull on Estates Podcast #49 - The Estate Trustee During Litigation Posted on March 6, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to "The Estate Trustee During Litigation"
Read the transcribed version of "The Estate Trustee During Litigation"
During Hull on Estates episode #49, David and Jason discuss issues concerning the estate trustee during litigation (ETDL). They consider the circumstances that call for an ETDL, the technical procedure for appointing the ETDL and the powers and duties of the ETDL.
For more information on this topic, see:
Salisbury v. Dell (1993 Ont. Gen Div);
Jordan Atin's artice, The Estate Trustee During Litigation, in Estate Litigation, volume 2. 2nd ed. (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2000) at p.24-1; and
Estates Act, R.S.O., c. E.21, as amended (s.28)
Tags: Beneficiary Designations, Executors and Trustees, Hull on Estates, Hull on Estates The Unwilling Beneficiary Posted on March 5, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments (1)
Trackbacks
Share Link
It is trite law that an executor’s duty is to bring in the assets of the estate and distribute to the beneficiaries. But what if the beneficiary of an estate cannot be found or has no interest in his inheritance? Reasonable steps must be taken to locate the beneficiary of an estate. But, in rare instances, a beneficiary may not be eager to be located or may disclaim his inheritance outright.
A case in point was recently reported by the BBC. A 1,000 acre estate in Cornwall, England (worth some five million pounds) is being administered by the Official Solicitor of the High Court, generating rental income of eighty-eight thousand pounds per year. John Paget Figg-Hoblyn inherited his father’s estate on his death in 1965 but, according to the BBC, has “not agreed to take up his inheritance.”
Apparently, he was finally located in 1994, living in a trailer park in California, but has once again since gone out of contact. The estate is apparently falling into disrepair.
As is often the case with estate issues reported in the mainstream media, key details are left unanswered. It appears that Mr. Figg-Hoblyn has not disclaimed his inheritance; rather, he just doesn’t want to be found!
However, we are reminded that the whole estate law regime is predicated on beneficiaries actually wanting to receive that to which they are entitled. I don’t know why Mr. Figg-Hoblyn does not want his inheritance but certainly no one can make him accept it. If his objective is to frustrate his father’s estate plan he appears to be succeeding….
Until tomorrow,
David
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Executors and Trustees Fact is Stranger than Fiction? Legally Adopting your Wife in Maine Posted on March 2, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
A rather unique estate battle is unfolding in Maine and Connecticut as reported on February 26, 2007 by the Associated Press.
Olive Watson took the unusual step of legally adopting her same sex partner, Patricia Spado, some fifteen years ago as a means of ensuring for Spado’s financial security and presumably to guarantee the provisions of Watson’s last will (which entirely benefited Spado) against any challenge by her siblings.
Remarkably, the adoption was apparently legal in Maine notwithstanding that Spado was a year older than Watson and the two shared a conjugal relationship. Watson and Spado subsequently amicably ended their relationship in 1992 after fourteen years.
It gets even more interesting: Watson’s father was none other than the founder of the predecessor of IBM who, on his death in 1993, left a multimillion dollar trust fund for the benefit of his eighteen “grandchildren” unaware that his daughter had legally adopted Spado. A Judge in Connecticut has found that Spado cannot share in the trust (Grandfather Watson not having been aware of the adoption when he settled the trust) and Spado has appealed. The Trustees of the trust fund have apparently also commenced proceedings in Maine to seek to annul the adoption although that prospect appears unlikely as it requires proof of deception or fraud.
To my mind, the surprising element of this story is that Spado would even assert an entitlement as a “grandchild” when the purpose of the adoption was clearly to provide certainty of her entitlement to Olive Watson’s estate. It would be interesting to examine the legal requirements of adoption in Maine in more detail. Presumably the state legislature will pause to consider amendments in the glare of the spotlight of the American media….
Have a great weekend,
David
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Ethical Issues, Executors and Trustees, Lesbian adoption, olive watson, patricia spado, same-sex marriage Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Podcast #49 - Protecting Your Children's Inheritance Posted on February 27, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Listen to "Protecting Your Children's Inheritance"
Read the transcribed version of "Protecting Your Children's Inheritance"
During Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Podcast #49, Suzana Popovic-Montag and Jordan Atin discuss considerations and techniques to ensure the proper use of inheritances. Some of these techniques include staggered inheritances, incentive trusts and charitable foundations.
Tags: Beneficiary Designations, Executors and Trustees, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Fiction is Stranger than Fact Posted on February 26, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
On the way into the office on the GO Train a couple of weeks back, an advertisement caught my eye. The “Book of the Month” was the unlikely titled “A Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian” by Marina Lewycka. Usually, I am not one for finding a good read from an advertisement in the newspaper, even though this one was apparently short-listed for the Mann Booker Prize 2005 (I am a sucker for anything that wins awards). However, this book (which I hasten to add I have not read) nonetheless caught the eye of this estate litigator with the following synopsis (culled from the Penguin website):
“For years two sisters have had as little to do with each other as possible…But now they had better learn how to get along, because since their mother’s death, their aging father has been sliding into his second childhood, and an alarming new woman has just entered his life. Valentina, a bosomy young synthetic blonde seems to think their father is much richer than he is and she is keen to see that he leaves this world with as little money to his name as possible. If the sisters don’t stop her no one will.”
I don’t know if Valentina marries the father, or whether he demands a marriage contract or whether the sisters file a Notice of Objection after their father’s death to challenge his new will. If the author’s audience is anyone other than estate lawyers, I expect these concerns don’t figure prominently in the plot. If nothing else, Ms. Lewycka joins the ranks of Dickens, Grisham, and others as authors who recognize the universal appeal of an estate fight…
Until tomorrow,
David M. Smith
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Estate Fights, Ethical Issues, Mann Booker Prize, Notice of Objection Guardianship of Property of Minor Children Posted on February 16, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
There are numerous situations where money might become payable to a minor child. For example, the child may be the beneficiary under a Will, RRSP, or insurance policy. Alternatively, he or she may have received funds through a court Order or settlement.
You might be surprised to know that in Ontario, while a parent is automatically his or her child’s guardian of the person, he or she is not automatically the child’s guardian of property. The only way for a parent to receive this authority is by statute, court Order, or other document, such as a Will.
Although the Office of the Children’s Lawyer represents minor children in property rights cases, it does not have the authority to act as guardian of property for minors. This means that unless a parent or guardian obtains the legal authority to receive funds for a child, then money to which the child becomes entitled will have to be paid into court and held by the Accountant of the Superior Court of Justice until the minor reaches eighteen years of age.
If money has been paid into court, the parent will have to apply to be appointed the minor’s guardian of property in order to withdraw it. Alternatively, if the funds are required for the direct benefit of the child, and the parent cannot afford the expense, the Office of the Children’s Lawyer has a procedure to request payments out of court.
For more information about the guardianship of property of minor children, you will find the information on the Ministry of the Attorney General’s website to be of use.
I hope you enjoyed my blogs this week. Have a great weekend!
Megan Connolly
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Attorney General, Beneficiary Designations, Guardian of Property Taxes on the Value of RRSPs Posted on February 13, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Last week, the Globe and Mail published an article on RRSP Myths, which is a timely subject with the deadline for contributions fast approaching. It dealt briefly with the taxation of an RRSP on the death of its holder.
The general rule is that, upon death, the holder is deemed to have withdrawn all the funds in the RRSP as at the date of death and will be taxed on the entire amount. This means that, generally speaking, the estate of the holder will pay the taxes, not the beneficiary of the RRSP.
The value of the RRSP is required to be reported on the deceased’s terminal tax return as part of his or her income in the year preceding death. Depending on the RRSP’s value and the total income of the deceased in that year, the proceeds of the RRSP might end up being taxed at the highest marginal value.
There are some circumstances where the estate will not be required to pay taxes on the RRSP:
If the beneficiary of the RRSP is the spouse or common law partner of the deceased, then the RRSP funds can be transferred to his or her RRSP or RRIF, or they can be used to purchase an annuity.
If the beneficiary of the RRSP is a financially dependant child or grandchild under the age of eighteen, the funds can be transferred to him or her to purchase an annuity. If the beneficiary is a financially dependant, mentally or physically infirm, child or grandchild of any age then the funds can be used to purchase an annuity or transferred to his or her RRSP or RRIF.
Another option is to designate a charity as the beneficiary. While the estate will still be liable to pay taxes on the value of the RRSP, it will be eligible for a tax credit, the effect of which is normally to offset the tax on the distribution.
For more information on these issues, check out the CRA Information sheet on the Death of an RRSP Annuitant.
Have a great day!
Megan Connolly
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, RRSP, taxes Testamentary Capacity: Are You in the Mood? Posted on February 2, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
A recent case out of England has led to an interesting twist on testamentary capacity. In Sharp v. Adam [2006] EWCA 449, the English Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s ruling that the unexplained exclusion of the testator’s daughters from his Will, together with evidence of brain deterioration (due to Multiple Sclerosis), was enough to set aside the Will on the basis of incapacity. This was despite evidence that the testator was able to communicate effectively by blinking and using a spelling board, and his experienced solicitor and family doctor were present when the Will was signed and had concluded that the testator had the requisite capacity.
In essence, the case turned on the lack of an explanation for why the testator had excluded his daughters. There was no evidence of undue influence by the named beneficiaries or of any problems with the daughters. While the Court of Appeal accepted that the testator’s ‘cognitive ability’ was satisfactory to make the Will, his ‘mood’ was not. In excluding his daughters inexplicably from his Will, the Court concluded that the testator’s ‘mood’ was so affected by his MS that this deprived him of the requisite testamentary capacity. This arguably raises the threshold for establishing testamentary capacity. A challenger to a Will may now be able to convince a court to set a Will aside on the basis that the testator’s mood was impaired, even if his/her cognitive abilities remained intact.
Have a great day!
Bianca La Neve
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Ethical Issues, Testamentary Capacity Hull on Estates Podcast #44 - Trustee Obligations to Beneficiaries Posted on January 30, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
LISTEN HERE
READ THE TRANSCRIBED PODCAST
During Hull on Estates Episode #44, Jason Allan and David Smith discuss the duties and obligations of trustees with specific consideration to trustees of discretionary trusts. They discuss various claims available to beneficiaries against a trustee who is alleged to have acted improperly and the defences available to the trustee.
Tags: Beneficiary Designations, Executors and Trustees, Hull on Estates, Hull on Estates, Trustees of Discretionary Trusts, beneficiary An End to Alzheimer's Posted on January 16, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
January 15, 2007 articles from the National Post and the Globe and Mail describe breakthroughs in Alzheimer’s research.
This encouraging news raises the possibility that we may be closer to a cure for this terrible disease, or at least treatments to slow the onset. Families struggling daily against the ravages of dementia can now see some light at the end of a very long tunnel.
Capacity law could be greatly affected as well. Current assessments to determine capacity, such as the capacity to manage property or the capacity to execute a Will, mix elements of science (such as cat scans) with the experience and judgment of the capacity assessor. Different assessors come to different conclusions in close cases.
As science can better identify and isolate genetic causes of dementia, we can expect more accurate tests. We might even see partial or comprehensive cures for dementia diseases. If so, patients who have lost capacity might recover it. Someone unable to sign a binding Will in 2006 could theoretically regain that ability in 2008.
This opens a Pandora’s box of fascinating questions. For example, if John Doe loses capacity in 2005 and regains it in 2010, who’s to say if he would name the same beneficiaries in 2011 as in 2004? Conceivably his personality may be significantly different after recovering capacity than it was before he lost it.
A beneficiary’s joy at recovering a loved one could be tempered by losing an inheritance.
Thanks for reading.
Sean Graham
Tags: Alzheimers, Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Elder Law Insurance Issues, Ethical Issues, Globe and Mail, National Post, capacity Providing for Disabled Beneficiaries PART V Posted on January 12, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
If a testator does not adequately shelter the bequests or insurance policy beneficiary designations to a disabled beneficiary, the disabled beneficiary may still have a way of sheltering the gift to him or her by taking advantage of what is known as a “disability expense trust”.
A disabled beneficiary, or member of a benefit unit, is entitled to put monies derived from an inheritance or the proceeds of a life insurance policy into a trust. These funds, up to a maximum value of $100,000, will not be considered assets for ODSP purposes.
This trust is distinct from a Henson Trust in that the funds may be received directly by the recipient and subsequently placed into the trust. Such a vehicle is available to shelter the funds were the testator failed to do so.
Any income earned on the funds and accrued will not be considered income to the disabled beneficiary if it the fund does not exceed $100,000.
Continue Reading... Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Executors and Trustees, ontario disability support program, power of attorney Providing for Disabled Beneficiaries PART IV Posted on January 11, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
The Ontario Disability Support Program specifically provides that an absolute discretionary trust, also known as a “Henson Trust”, is not considered to be an asset of the disabled beneficiary. Thus, this gives a testator a significant planning vehicle to provide for a disabled beneficiary.
The discretionary trust must be truly discretionary, and the disabled beneficiary must have no vested right in the trust. Otherwise, the ODSP will consider the trust to be an asset of the disabled beneficiary.
To be a true discretionary trust, the trust must provide that any distributions to the disabled beneficiary are in the absolute discretion of the trustee. There must also be a gift over to a third party, so that the disabled beneficiary is not able to call for the collapse of the trust. Thirdly, the testator should provide for the distribution of any accrued income during the 21 year period, so that there is not a forced distribution of these funds.
Typically, the trustee will use the fund to purchase exempted assets for the disabled beneficiary, or to make distributions of income to the disabled beneficiary up to the $5,000 threshold, or to provide for the disabled individual once they turn 65 and are no longer entitled to benefits.
As the discretionary trust is not an asset of the disabled beneficiary, there is no limit to the amount that can be placed in the trust.
As the discretion given to the trustee is absolute, the choice of a trustee is of particular importance.
Have a great day.
Paul Trudelle
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Executors and Trustees, ontario disability support program Providing for Disabled Beneficiaries - PART III Posted on January 10, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Yesterday, I introduced the basic principals of the Ontario Disability Support Program (“ODSP”). In order to maintain benefits, the disabled individual must acquire assets that exceed the income and asset thresholds. In an estate planning context, this can be achieved, to a certain extent, by effective planning.
The ODSP exempts a number of assets from the calculation of the disabled person’s assets as defined under the relevant legislation and regulations. These exempted assets can be gifted to the disabled beneficiary, or bequested under a will, without disqualifying the individual. A partial list of assets that can be gifted or bequested includes:
• A principal residence, or the proceeds from the sale of a principal residence, provided that the proceeds are used for the purchase of another principal residence within 12 months from sale;
• An interest in a second property, if the Director is satisfied that the property is necessary for the health or well-being of a member of the benefit unit. For example, a second property that is a cottage could be considered necessary for health and well-being. Further, a second property in a country with currency restrictions that cannot be liquidated or where proceeds cannot be remitted outside of the country may also be exempted
• One motor vehicle, regardless of value, and a second vehicle if the net value is no more than $15,000 and it is required to permit a dependent of the applicant to maintain employment;
• The total cash surrender value held in an insurance policy, to a limit of $100,000;
• Prepaid funerals for an applicant or spouse;
• Registered Education Savings Plans;
• The amount remaining to be paid to a member of the benefit unit under a mortgage or agreement for sale (however, actual payments received qualify as income);
Continue Reading... Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Ethical Issues, disabled beneficiary, ontario disability support program Providing For Disabled Beneficiaries Posted on January 8, 2007 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
UNABASHED PLUG: On January 17, 2007 I will be speaking as part of the Hull and Hull Breakfast Series Seminars. (For information, please see our website.). I am presenting a paper entitled “The Ontario Disability Support Program: What Every Estate Solicitor Needs to Know”.
As a lead up to that presentation (and to take advantage of the research done to prepare the paper), I thought I would spend some of my blog time this week discussing some of the issues to be considered were a disabled beneficiary is involved.
When one is planning an estate that involves a disabled beneficiary, special considerations must be taken into account. Obviously, the disabled beneficiary has special needs. The testator must discuss his or her hopes and goals in providing for the disabled beneficiary with the planner in order to ensure that these needs are, to the extent possible, facilitated. In addition, the estate planner must ensure that the benefits sought to be bestowed upon the disabled beneficiary are maximized.
The estate planner must ensure that these issues are fully canvassed. The estate planner must make efforts to ensure that a proper level of comfort is established with the client, as many clients are reluctant to discuss particulars of a disabled child. Further, the client may not be aware of the significance of the disability on his or her own estate plan.
Specifically, when considering an estate plan involving a disabled beneficiary, any bequests should be considered in light of the relevant social assistance legislation.
In Ontario, a program called the Ontario Disability Support Program exists. This program provides benefits to disabled Ontarians who meet certain financial and medical eligibility requirements. Once qualified, the ODSP recipient is entitled to income supplements of up to $979 per month. In addition, and often more importantly, the recipient is entitled to drug and dental benefits. Over the course of the disabled person’s lifetime, these benefits can be substantial.
Continue Reading... Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Ethical Issues, assets, disabled beneficiary, ontario disability support program Hull on Estates Podcast #24 - Disclosure to Beneficiaries Posted on September 5, 2006 by Suzana Popovic-Montag Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
LISTEN HERE
READ THE TRANSCRIBED PODCAST HERE
During Hull on Estates Episode #24, we discussed the issue of disclosure of information by trustees to beneficiaries. We referred to the cases:
O'Rourke v. Derbyshire, [1920] A.C. 581 (H.L.); Re Ballard Estate (1994), 20 O.R. (3d) 350 (O.C.G.D.); Fox v. Fox Estate (1996), 10 E.T.R. (2d) 229 (Ont. C.A.); and
David Steele's article, "Beneficiary's Right to Know", 4th Annual Estates and Trusts Forum, LSUC.
Tags: Beneficiary Designations, Hull on Estates, Hull on Estates MAKING AND REVOKING OF BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS - PART V Posted on August 4, 2006 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
We have made note this week of the fact that a beneficiary designation is subject to considerably less legal formality than a Will. The fact that many Canadians do not have Wills often means that the designation of a beneficiary is the primary means by which an individual engages in estate planning. This is particularly true of those in their thirties or forties whose largest assets will often be RRSPs or life insurance policies. We have noted that such estate planning has the benefit of clearly directing assets to the intended beneficiary without the need for obtaining probate of a Will.
Certainly, non-legal professionals such as financial advisors will frequently highlight the benefits to their clients of structuring their affairs in such a way as to minimize estate administration tax. Lawyers, as well, will recommend such benefits, mindful of the pitfalls associated when a beneficiary does not act as intended. For instance, where an individual designates a beneficiary of an asset, not for that person's personal benefit but rather, to distribute in accordance with a Will or some other written or verbal instructions (ie. a secret trust), the issue of trust becomes paramount.
What if the beneficiary does not distribute the asset as the deceased intended but keeps it for herself? For the litigation lawyer, it may be a serious challenge to prove a breach of trust on behalf of disappointed beneficiaries. The designated beneficiary can simply take the position that she has received all right, title and interest in the asset. If the designated beneficiary is herself named executor of the deceased's estate, there may well be some legitimate questions as to whether she was expected to distribute the asset in accordance with the Will. The designation, if contained in the Will, may ideally clarify whether the asset is to be subject to the terms of the Will.
Have a great weekend and we'll be back on Tuesday, David. --------
Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, Planning, Wills, beneficiary, designations, estate MAKING AND REVOKING OF BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS - PART IV Posted on August 3, 2006 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Earlier this week we discussed the interaction between Will challenges and challenges to beneficiary designations. Specifically, an invalid Will may nonetheless contain a beneficiary designation which will be recognized by the Court as valid. An example would be a Will witnessed by only one person and therefore invalid in Ontario. Since there are no formal requirements required for the making of a beneficiary designation, a beneficiary designation contained in such Will may still be valid.
But what is the test for capacity to make a beneficiary designation? It would appear that the test is similar to the test for testamentary capacity to make a Will. The onus is on the proponent of the new designation to show that the maker of the designation had the necessary mental capacity to understand what he was signing.
What if a person is incapable? Can their attorney under a power of attorney for property make a beneficiary designation on their behalf?
It seems settled that an attorney under a Continuing Power of Attorney for Property cannot appoint a beneficiary under a life insurance policy or a registered plan as these acts are in the nature of a testamentary disposition.
Continue Reading... Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations MAKING AND REVOKING OF BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS - PART III Posted on August 2, 2006 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
In our ongoing discussion of beneficiary designations, today's focus will be on the hallmarks of a valid revocation by Will.
As we discussed yesterday, section 52 of the Succession Law Reform Act provides an overview of the legal requirements of the revocation of a beneficiary designation.
One of the requirements of the statute was that a revocation of a beneficiary designation in a Will must relate "expressly to the designation, either generally or specifically."
So, for instance, a holograph Will (a valid unwitnessed Will when made entirely in the handwriting of the testator and signed by him) that lists all of the testator's assets and references those assets that are RRSPs as such, and proceeds to thereafter list the beneficiaries of the estate to share in the assets does NOT constitute a revocation of a beneficiary designation. (Laczova Estate v. House [2001] O.J. No.4992 (Ont. C.A)).
Continue Reading... Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations MAKING AND REVOKING OF BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS - PART II Posted on August 1, 2006 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Yesterday's blog introduced the topic of beneficiary designations and considered the law in Ontario as it related to the making of beneficiary designations. Today, we consider the law as it relates to the revocation of such beneficiary designations. This applicable statute is section 52 of the Succession Law Reform Act which, as annotated, reads as follows (with underlined words added for emphasis): s. 52(1) A revocation in a will is effective to revoke a designation made by instrument only if the revocation relates expressly to the designation, either generally or specifically.The revocation of a RRSP, for example, must reference the RRSP in sufficient detail, to leave no doubt as to which instrument is being revoked. However, the Courts have had to consider how to interpret this subsection. We will consider this issue further in tomorrow's blog. (2) Despite section 15*, a later designation revokes an earlier designation to the extent of any inconsistency.*Section 15 of the SLRA states that a will is revoked only by: marriage, a later will, a written declaration made with the formality of a will, or destruction by the testator or another person under his or her presence and direction. (3) Revocation of a will revokes a designation in the will.(4) A designation or revocation contained in an instrument purporting to be a will is not invalid by reason only of the fact that the instrument is invalid as a will. Continue Reading... Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, RRSP, beneficiary, designations MAKING AND REVOKING OF BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS - PART I Posted on July 31, 2006 by Hull & Hull LLP Email This
Print
Comments
Trackbacks
Share Link
Hello, my name is David M. Smith and I am a partner (and now one of the resident bloggers) at Hull & Hull LLP. The focus of this week's blogs will be on beneficiary designations. While the natural tendency is to focus on the assets of the estate, we know that the reality is that, quite often, those assets which pass outside of the estate by way of beneficiary designation will exceed the value of the estate assets.
Indeed, an increasingly common estate planning tool is to hold as many assets as possible outside of the estate, primarily as a legitimate means of avoiding estate administration tax (more commonly known as probate fees) and, in certain cases, protection from creditors.
The most common example of such assets that come to mind are Life Insurance, Registered Retirement Saving Plans ("RRSP") or Registered Retirement Income Funds ("RRIF"). Similarly, (and an issue to be considered in future blogs), assets that are jointly held (unless impressed with a trust for the estate) will pass to the surviving joint owner by right of survivorship.
The making and revoking of beneficiary designations are not always simple matters and, regrettably, litigation may ensue where there is uncertainty. Recent caselaw has raised some interesting twists on this developing area of estate litigation.
In Ontario, the provisions of Part III of the Succession Law Reform Act relating to the making of a beneficiary designation are contained in section 51 which reads as follows (within underlining added for emphasis):
s. 51(1) A participant may designate a person to receive a benefit payable under a plan on the participant's death,
(a) by an instrument signed by him or her or signed on his or her behalf by another person in his or her presence and by his or her direction; or (b) by will, and may revoke the designation by either of these methods. s. 51(2) A designation in a will is effective only if it relates expressly to a plan, either generally or specifically.
Continue Reading... Tags: Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates, Beneficiary Designations, act, beneficiary, designations, insurance Topics PODCASTS / AUDIO Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Show notes
Hull on Estates Show notes
PODCASTS / TRANSCRIBED Hull on Estate and Succession Planning
Hull on Estates
TOPICS Beneficiary Designations
Capacity
Charities
Common Law Spouses
Elder Law
Elder Law Insurance Issues
Estate & Trust
Estate Litigation
Estate Planning
Ethical Issues
Executors and Trustees
In the News
Joint Accounts
Litigation
Mediation
Mediators
New Media Observations
New Years Resolutions
News & Events
Pension Benefits
Power of Attorney
RRSPs/Insurance Policies
Succession Planning
Support After Death
The Long Tail
Trustees
Wills
Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates
Archives Search This Site Enter keywords:
Subscribe Add this blog to your feeds or subscribe by email More...
Recent Updates Motions in Estates Litigation: Longer Than You Think
The Millionaire, His Mistress, His Will & the ex-Governor
The Freezing of the Assets - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning #160
The Role of the Office of the Public Guardian Trustee - Hull on Estates #158
Can a Net Family Property Equalization election set aside an estate freeze?
Ouch! It hurts...
Life Insurance as Property: Timing is everything
Insurance Trusts and Estate Administration Tax
Administration Bonds - Hull on Estates #157
What Do We Expect From Our Clients? - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning #159
Links California Tax Attorney Blog
Daniel Lublin's Toronto Employment Law Blog
BAR-eX - Resources for the Ontario Legal Community.
The Estate House
Rob Hyndman's Technology Law Blog
Church of The Customer Blog
Jordan Atin - The Family War
Shel Israel's Naked Conversations Blog
Seth Godin's Blog
C.C. Chapman
Inside PR
Rule of Law
LexBlog
Topic Blogs Above the Law: A Legal Tabloid - David Lat
Adventure of Strategy - Rob Millard
Advertising & Marketing Lawyer & Attorney - Sheppard Mullin Law Firm
Advertising & Marketing Lawyer & Attorney : Reed Smith Law Firm
Advertising & Media Lawyer & Attorney - Reed Smith Law Firm
Alabama Divorce & Family Lawyer & Attorney - Sherman & Jeffries
Alabama Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Sirote & Permutt Law Firm
Alabama Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Lightfoot Franklin & White
Alaska Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Power & Brown Law Firm
Alexis Martin Neely's Law Business Revolution - Attorney Coaching & Consulting
Amazing Firms, Amazing Practices - Gerry Riskin
Anchorage Divorce Lawyer & Attorney - Peg Roston Law Firm
Angiosarcoma Lawyer & Attorney - Burke & Eisner Law Firm
Antitrust Lawyers & Attorneys - Sheppard Mullin
Arizona DUI Lawyer & Attorney - Koplow & Patane
Arizona Eminent Domain Lawyer & Attorney - Zeitlin & Zeitlin Law Firm
Arizona Family Law Lawyer & Attorney - Nirenstein Ruotolo Group
Arizona Injury and Insurance Lawyer & Attorney - Koplow & Patane Law Firm
Arizona Nursing Home Lawyer & Attorney - Solomon & Relihan Law Firm
Arizona Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Solomon & Relihan Law Firm
Arkansas Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Allen Law Firm
Art Law Lawyer & Attorney - Sheppard Mullin Law Firm
Asset Search Lawyer & Attorney - Fred Abrams
Atlanta Bankruptcy Lawyer & Attorney - Scott Riddle
Atlanta Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Ken Shigley
Atlanta Workers' Compensation Lawyer & Attorney - Seth Bader Law Firm
Attorney Fee Analysis & Litigation Management Lawyer - Barger & Wolen Law Firm
Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Dax Garvin
Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Jamie Spencer
Austin DWI Lawyer & Attorney - Jamie Spencer
Austin DWI Lawyer & Attorney - Law Office of Ken Gibson
Aviation Lawyer & Attorney - Chevalier, Allen & Lichman Law Firm
Bag and Baggage - Denise Howell
Bankruptcy Lawyer & Attorney - Total Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy Lawyer Blog - Start Fresh Today
Bankruptcy and Creditors Rights Advisor - Corporate Recovery Associates
Bankruptcy and Restructuring Law Firm - Sheppard Mullin
Bay Area Estate Planning Lawyer & Attorney - Karen Meckstroth Law Firm
Bay Area Real Estate Lawyer & Attorney - David Winton Law Firm
Benefits Blog - Janell Grenier
Benzene and Leukemia Lawyer & Attorney - Burke & Eisner Law Firm
Birmingham Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Steven D. Eversole
Birmingham Divorce Lawyer & Attorney - Steven D. Eversole
Boston Aviation Lawyer & Attorney - Sullivan & Worcester Law Firm
Boston Insurance & ERISA Lawyer & Attorney - Stephen Rosenberg
Boston Startup Lawyer & Attorney - Foley Hoag Law Firm
Botulism Lawyer & Attorney - Marler Clark Law Firm
Brain Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Bruce H. Stern
British Columbia Insurance Lawyer & Attorney - Michael Thomas
British Columbia Renewable Energy Lawyer & Attorney - Clark Wilson Law Firm
Broadcast & Communication Lawyer & Attorney - Fletcher Heald & Hildreth Law Firm
CAFA Lawyer & Attorney - McGlinchey Stafford
California Appellate Lawyer & Attorney - Archer Norris Law Firm
California Aviation Lawyer & Attorney - Mike Danko Law Firm
California Consumer Finance Lawyer & Attorney - O'Rielly & Roche Law Firm
California Creditor's Rights & Business Bankruptcy Lawyer - Robert Eisenbach
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney - Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm
California Disability Insurance Lawyer & Attorney - Barger & Wolen Law Firm
California Employment Law Lawyer & Attorney - Carlton DiSante & Freudenberger
California Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Van Vleck Turner & Zaller
California Intellectual Property Lawyer & Attorney - Weintraub Genshlea Chediak
California License Lawyer & Attorney : Fredrick M. Ray Law Firm
California Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Jeff Huron Law Firm
California Mesothelioma & Asbestos Lawyer & Attorney - Anthony Vieira
Canadian Securities Lawyer & Attorney - Stikeman Elliott Law Firm
Canadian Trademark Lawyer & Attorney - MacPherson Leslie & Tyerman LLP
Cash Flow & Structured Settlements - Integral Financial Solutions LLC
Cerebral Palsy Lawyer & Attorney - Burke & Eisner
Chicago Art Law Lawyer & Attorney - Bryan Cave Law Firm
Chicago Business Bankruptcy Lawyer & Attorney - Steve Jakubowski
Chicago Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Denise Nalley Law Firm
Chicago Divorce Lawyer & Attorney - Pearlman Law Firm
Chicago Legal Malpractice Lawyer & Attorney - Coleman Law Firm
Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - William G. Pintas
Chicago Trial Lawyer & Attorney - Philip Berenz
China Business Law Lawyers & Attorneys - Sheppard Mullin Law Firm
China Insurance & Anti-Trust Lawyer : Grandall Legal Group Law Firm
Class Action Lawyer & Attorney - J. Russell Jackson
Class Action Lawyer & Attorney - Meiselman, Denlea, Packman, Carton & Eberz
Climate Change Policy Law Firm - McKenna Long & Aldridge
Climate Law Update - Thelen Reid Law Firm
Clinical Bioethics Consultant & Attorney - Bernard W. Freedman
Collin County DWI Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Hunter Biederman
Colorado ERISA Lawyer & Attorney - Davis Graham & Stubbs Law Firm
Colorado Homeowner Association Lawyer & Attorney - HindmanSanchez
Colorado Homeowners Association Lawyer & Attorney - Winzenburg Leff
Colorado Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Mac Hester
Colorado Toxic Torts Lawyer & Attorney - Davis Graham & Stubbs Law Firm
Columbus Ohio Business Lawyer & Attorney - Teri Rasmussen
Complementary & Alternative Medicine Lawyer - Michael H. Cohen
Computer Forensics & E-Discovery Specialist - Electronic Evidence Retrieval
Connecticut Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Rogers & Tartaro Law Firm
Connecticut Education Lawyer & Attorney - Berchem, Moses & Devlin, P.C.
Connecticut Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Daniel Schwartz
Connecticut Estate Planning Lawyer & Attorney - CT Trust Counsel Law Firm
Construction and Engineering Lawyer & Attorney - K&L Gates Law Firm
Consumer Finance Lawyer & Attorney - Kelley Drye & Warren Law Firm
Corporate & Securities Law Firm - Sheppard Mullin
Corporate Finance Lawyer & Attorney - Davis Wright Tremaine Law Firm
Cost-Effective Legal Solutions - Counsel On Call
Court Filings, Decisions, and Legal Articles - JD Supra
DUI Law Blog - DWI & Drunk Driving Commentary & News
DUI Lawyer & Attorney - Total DUI
Dallas Bankruptcy Lawyer & Attorney - Fears Nachawati Law Firm
Dallas DWI Lawyer & Attorney - Troy Burleson Law Firm
Dallas Divorce and Family Law Lawyer & Attorney - Verner & Brumley Law Firm
Dallas Texas Accident Lawyer & Attorney - Fears Nachawati Law Firm
Delaware Bankruptcy Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
Delaware Business Bankruptcy Lawyer & Attorney - Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams
Delaware Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Morris James
Delaware IP Lawyer & Attorney - Morris James
Delaware Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Francis G.X. Pileggi
Denver Criminal Lawyer & Attorney - Vee Iyer Law Firm
Denver Non-Compete Lawyer & Attorney - Bond & Morris Law Firm
Directors and Officers Liability and Insurance - The D & O Diary : Kevin LaCroix
Disability Benefits Lawyer & Attorney - Dell & Schaefer
E-Discovery Lawyer & Attorney - Quarles & Brady Law Firm
E-Discovery Source - RenewData Corp.
EFCA Lawyer & Attorney - McKenna Long & Aldridge Law Firm
ERISA & Disability Benefits Lawyer & Attorney - Branham & Day
ESOP Lawyer & Attorney - Sheppard Mullin Law Firm
EU & International Tax Lawyer & Attorney - Marco Rossi Law Firm
East Texas Appeals & Motions Lawyer & Attorney - Jeff Rambin Law Firm
Electronic Discovery Commentary - Lighthouse Document Technology
Electronic Discovery Law Firm - K&L Gates
Employee Benefit Plans & Retirement Programs - Jerry Kalish
Employee Benefits Lawyer & Attorney - Giller & Calhoun La Firm
Employee Rights Lawyer & Consultant : Ellen Simon Law Firm
Employment & Labor Lawyer & Attorney - Reed Smith Law Firm
Employment & Labor Relations Lawyer & Attorney - Porter Wright Law Firm
Employment Law Monitor - Cole Schotz Law Firm
Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Ogletree Deakins Law Firm
Employment Privacy Law Lawyer & Attorney - Littler Mendelson
Energy Lawyer & Attorney - Liskow & Lewis
Enterobacter Sakazakii Lawyer & Attorney - Marler Clark Law Firm
Environmental & Energy Lawyer & Attorney - Cole Schotz Law Firm
Environmental Lawyer & Attorney - Foley Hoag Law Firm
Environmental Lawyer & Attorney - Reed Smith Law Firm
Ernie the Attorney - Ernest Svenson
Event ACCess Blog - Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC)
Executive Women's Networking Blog - Epstein Becker & Green Law Firm
Fair Use Lawyer & Attorney - Blackwell Sanders Law Firm
Fashion Apparel Lawyer & Attorney - Sheppard Mullin
Federal Disability Lawyer & Attorney - Jeffery P. McLane Law Firm
Federal Government Construction Contracting Lawyer & Attorney - Payne Hackenbracht & Sullivan
Federal Securities Lawyer & Attorney - Porter Wright Morris & Arthur Law Firm
Financial Industry Lawyer & Attorney - Hunton & Williams Law Firm
Financial Institution Law Firm - Sheppard Mullin
Financial Services Lobbying Blog - Blank Rome Government Relations
Florida Condo & HOA Lawyer & Attorney - Becker & Poliakoff Law Firm
Florida Construction Lawyer & Attorney - Levin Tannenbaum Law Firm
Florida Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Ronald Chapman Law Firm
Florida Estate Planning Lawyer & Attorney - David Shulman Law Firm
Florida Estate Planning Lawyer & Attorney - Stokes McMillan Maracini & Ant�nez
Florida Insurance Lawyer & Attorney - Merlin Law Group
Florida Insurance Lawyer & Attorney - Nation Law Firm
Florida Patent Attorneys & IP Lawyers - John Rizvi
Florida Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - LaBovick LaBovick & Wald
Florida Probate Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Juan Antunez
Florida Special Needs Lawyer & Attorney - David J. Lillesand Law Firm
Florida Workers' Compensation Lawyer & Attorney - David A. McCranie
Food Liability and Safety Lawyer & Attorney - Stoel Rives Law Firm
Food Poisoning Lawyer & Attorney - Pritzker Ruohonen
Food Safety & Environmental Health Blog - Environ Health Associates
Food Safety Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Gass Weber Mullins Law Firm
Franchise Lawyer & Attorney - Charles Internicola Law Firm
Georgia Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Gillen Withers & Lake Law Firm
Georgia Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Robert Katz Law Firm
Global Climate Law Blog - Howrey Law Firm Climate Attorneys and Environmental Lawyers
Government Contracts Lawyer & Attorney - Sheppard Mullin Law Firm
Green Building & Construction LEED AP, Lawyer & Attorney Chris Cheatham - WTHF Law Firm
Green Building Consulting - Rich Cartlidge
Green Building Lawyer & Attorney - Pullman & Comley Law Firm
Green Building Lawyer & Attorney - Shari Shapiro
Health Care Lawyer & Attorney - Epstein Becker & Green Law Firm
Healthcare IT Lawyer & Attorney : Post & Schell Law Firm
Hearing Loss Disability Lawyer & Attorney - John Waldo Law Firm
Hospitality Lawyer & Attorney - Davis Wright Tremaine Law Firm
Houston Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Arnold & Itkin Law Firm
Houston Business Technology & Accountants - Greg Price
Houston Criminal Defense & DWI Lawyer & Attorney - Grant Scheiner Law Firm
Houston Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Madrid Martinez & Associates Law Firm
Houston Divorce Lawyer & Attorney - Cavers Law Firm
Houston Injury and Accident Lawyer & Attorney - Vujasinovic & Beckcom Law Firm
Houston Insurance Lawyer & Attorney - McCormick Hancock Newton Law Firm
Houston Maritime Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Vujasinovic & Beckcom
Houston Medical Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Arnold & Itkin Law Firm
Houston Patent & Contingent Fee Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - McClanahan Myers Espey Law Firm
Houston Truck Accident Lawyer & Attorney - Arnold & Itkin Law Firm
IP ADR Lawyer & Attorney - Intellectual Property ADR Services
IP Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Mann Law Group
Idaho Criminal Lawyer & Attorney - Chuck Peterson Law Firm
Illinois Civil Rights Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Andrew M. Hale & Associates
Illinois Construction Lawyer & Attorney - Foran Glennon Palandech & Ponzi Law Firm
Illinois Workers' Compensation Lawyer & Attorney: Michael Helfand
Immigration Lawyer & Attorney - Littler Mendelson Law Firm
InHouse ACCess Blog - Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC)
Insurance Defense Attorney & Lawyer - Strong & Hanni
Insurance Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - National Insurance Law Forum
Intellectual Property & Licensing Law - Raymond Nimmer
Intellectual Property Lawyer & Attorney - Winthrop & Weinstine Law Firm
Inter Alia - Tom Mighell
Investment Immigration Lawyer & Attorney - Vaughan de Kirby Law Firm
Iowa Corporate Lawyer & Attorney - Rush Nigut
Iowa Immigration Lawyer & Attorney - Austin Kennedy
Iowa Lawyer & Attorney - Sullivan & Ward Law Firm
Ireland Property Solicitor - Paul Mc Nally Law Firm
Jacksonville Small Business Lawyer & Attorney - Sabrina Bateh Law Firm
Kansas City Divorce Lawyer & Attorney - Mark Wortman
Kansas City Health Care Lawyer & Attorney - Lathrop & Gage Law Firm
Kansas Death Care and Preneed Lawyer & Attorney - Stalter Legal Services Law Firm
Labor & Employment Lawyer - Sheppard Mullin
Lancaster, Pennsylvania Lawyer & Attorney - Russell Krafft & Gruber Law Firm
Las Vegas Brain and Spine Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Timothy Titolo
Law Blog - WSJ.com
Law Blogs, Blawgs, Law Firm Marketing - Kevin O'Keefe
Law Firm Coaching & Consulting - Cordell Parvin
Law Firm Management & Marketing Consultant - Patrick Lamb
Law Firm Management Consultant - Ronda Muir
Law Firm Marketing & Business Development - The Rainmaker Institute
Law Firm Marketing for Lawyers & Attorneys - Tom Kane
Law Firm Web Site SEO - Tim Stanley
Law Firm Web Strategy - Steve Matthews
Law Practice Management & Lawyer Coaching - Ed Poll
Lawtech Guru Blog - Jeff Beard
Lawyer Collaboration Tools & Technologies - Dennis Kennedy & Tom Mighell
Lawyers Using Twitter - LexTweet
Legal Ethics and Marketing for Lawyers & Attorneys - Will Hornsby
Legal Ghostwriter & Content for Law Firms - Janet Raasch
Legal Malpractice Attorney & Lawyer - Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LexBlog Lawyer Blogs
LexConference : Legal & Law Conference Coverage by LexBlog
Life Sciences Lawyers & Attorneys - Reed Smith Law Firm
Long Island Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Cassisi & Cassisi Law Firm
Los Angeles Asbestos Lawyer & Attorney - Seth Davidson
Los Angeles Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Daniel Reisman Law Firm
Los Angeles Probate Lawyer & Attorney : Schomer Law Firm
Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Lawyer & Attorney - Erich P. Rapp
Louisiana Lawyers & Attorneys - Kean Miller
Maine Injury & Accident Lawyer & Attorney - Joe Bornstein Law Firm
Maryland IP Lawyer & Attorney - Brian Wm. Higgins
Mass Tort Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Sean P. Wajert - Dechert Law Firm
Massachusetts Divorce Lawyer & Attorney - Burns & Levinson Law Firm
Massachusetts Noncompete Lawyer & Attorney - Foley Hoag Law Firm
Medical Liability Law Firm - Strong & Hanni Law Firm
Medical and Dental Patent Lawyer & Attorney - Gold & Rizvi Law Firm
Memphis Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - James Ferrell
Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer & Attorney - Jordan E. Bublick
Michigan Health Care Lawyer & Attorney - Smith Haughey Rice & Roegge Law Firm
Minnesota Car Accident & Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Brown Law Firm
Minnesota Criminal Lawyer & Attorney - Brown Law Firm
Minnesota DWI Lawyer & Attorney - Brown Law Firm
Minnesota DWI Lawyer & Attorney - Chuck Ramsay
Minnesota Divorce and Family Law Lawyer & Attorney - Brown Law Firm
Mississippi Business Lawyer & Attorney - Jake Adams
Mississippi Construction Lawyer & Attorney - Robinson, Biggs, Ingram, Solop & Farris Law Firm
Mississippi Litigation Review and Commentary - Phillip Thomas Law Firm
Mortgage Lending Abuse Lawyer & Attorney - David Campbell Smith
My Shingle - Carolyn Elefant
MyShingle: Solo and Small Law Firm Management - Carolyn Elefant
NY / NJ Medical Malpractice Lawyer & Attorney - Cerrussi & Gunn Law Firm
NY Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Scott Greenfield
Nanotechnology Lawyer & Attorney - Porter Wright Morris & Arthur
Native American Lawyer & Attorney - Foster Pepper Law Firm
Negotiation and Arbitration - Settle It Now Dispute Resolution Services
Nevada Appellate Lawyer & Attorney - Tami D. Cowden
Nevada Workers' Compensation Lawyer & Attorney - Virginia Hunt Law Firm
New Hampshire Divorce Lawyer & Attorney - Crusco Law Firm
New Jersey Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Travis Tormey Law Firm
New Jersey Criminal Lawyer & Attorney - Thomas Martin Law Firm
New Jersey Eminent Domain Lawyer & Attorney - Carlin & Ward
New Jersey Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
New Jersey Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Steinberg Law Offices
New Jersey Family Law & Divorce Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
New Jersey Family Lawyer & Attorney - Flaster Greenberg Law Firm
New Jersey HIPAA Healthcare Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
New Jersey Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Scott D. Grossman Law Firm
New Jersey Intellectual Property Lawyer & Attorney - Richard Gearhart Law Firm
New Jersey Labor and Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Mark E. Tabakman of Fox Rothschild LLP
New Jersey Lawyer & Attorney - Stark & Stark
New Jersey Probate Lawyer & Attorney - Cohn Lifland Pearlman Hermann & Knopf Law Firm
New Jersey Public Safety Officers Lawyer & Attorney - Arpaia & Crivelli Law Firm
New Jersey Special Needs Children Lawyer & Attorney - Cole Schotz Law Firm
New Jersey White Collar Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
New Media Lawyer & Attorney - Catherine Kirkman
New Mexico Search & Seizure Lawyer & Attorney - Kennedy & Oliver
New York & Seattle Corporate Dispute Lawyer & Attorney - Grace M. Healy
New York Business Divorce - Peter Mahler
New York Civil Service Attorney & Lawyer - Kevin P. Sheerin
New York Disability Lawyer & Attorney - Turley Redmond & Rosasco
New York Divorce & Family Lawyer & Attorney - Daniel Clement
New York Divorce Lawyer & Attorney - David A. Gabay
New York Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Greenwald Doherty Law Firm
New York Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Robert Ottinger Law Firm
New York Life Insurance Compliance Lawyer & Attorney - Currin Compliance Services LLC
New York Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - John M. Hochfelder Law Firm
New York Private Equity Lawyer & Attorney - Geoffrey Parnass
New York Probate Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Philip Bernstein
New York Technology & New Media Lawyer & Attorney - Proskauer Rose Law Firm
New York Trusts & Estates Lawyer & Attorney - Farrell Fritz Law Firm
News Media Lawyer & Attorney - Brooks Pierce Law Firm
Non-Compete Lawyer & Attorney - Epstein Becker & Green Law Firm
North Carolina Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Brooks Pierce Law Firm
North Carolina Estate Planning Lawyer & Attorney - Trust Counsel, PA
North Carolina Product Liability Lawyer & Attorney - D. Hardison Wood
North Carolina Workers' Compensation Lawyer & Attorney - Deuterman Law Firm
North Virginia Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Brien Roche Law Firm
Northeast Employee Benefits Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
Northwest Education Lawyer & Attorney - Williams Kastner Law Firm
Northwest Labor and Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Stoel Rives Law Firm
Northwest Real Estate Lawyers & Attorneys - Davis Wright Tremaine Law Firm
Notes from the (Legal) Underground - Evan Schaeffer
Nursing Home Abuse Blog by Jonathan Rosenfeld
Nursing Home Lawyer & Attorney - Stark & Stark
Ohio Environmental Lawyer & Attorney - Frantz Ward Law Firm
Ohio Health Care Lawyer & Attorney - Schottenstein Zox & Dunn Law Firm
Ohio Health Lawyer & Attorney - Jayne E. Juvan
Ohio Real Estate Lawyer & Attorney - Ulmer & Berne Law Firm
Oklahoma Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Tony Laizure
Oklahoma Insurance Lawyer & Attorney - Stauffer, Graves & Nathan Law Firm
Ontario Condominium Lawyer & Attorney - Gardiner Miller Arnold Law Firm
Open Government Lawyer & Attorney - Foster Pepper Law Firm
Orange County Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Morris & Stone Law Firm
Overlawyered - Walter Olson
Palm Springs Estate Planning Lawyer & Attorney - Daryl Binkley
Pennsylvania Brownfields & Environment Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
Pennsylvania Divorce & Family Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
Pennsylvania Eminent Domain Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
Pennsylvania Estate Planning Lawyer & Attorney - Jakubik Law Firm
Pennsylvania Family Medical Leave Act Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
Pennsylvania Health Law Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Rothschild Law Firm
Pennsylvania Labor & Employment Lawyer & Attorney - McNees Wallace & Nurick Law Firm
Pennsylvania Law Monitor - Stark & Stark Law Firm
Pennsylvania Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Barley Snyder
Pennsylvania Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Stuart Carpey Law Firm
Pennsylvania Trusts & Estates Lawyer & Expert Witness - Patti Spencer Law Firm
Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Total Injury
Pet Trust Lawyer & Attorney - Danny Meek Law Firm
Pharmaceutical & Toxic Torts Law Blog - Spencer Fane Britt & Browne
Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Peter C. Amuso Law Firm
Philadelphia Trial and Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Max Kennerly
Plano Texas Bankruptcy Lawyer & Attorney - Rochelle, Hutcheson & McCullough Law Firm
Podiatry Malpractice Lawyer & Attorney - Michael A. Quinn Law Firm
Point of Law - Walter Olson
Portland Insurance Coverage Lawyer & Attorney - David Rossmiller
Privacy & Information Security Law Blog - Hunton & Williams
Privacy Lawyer & Attorney - Proskauer Rose
Privacy and Security Law - Davis Wright Tremaine
Public Interest Law & Technology Commentary - Techno.la
RFID Lawyer & Attorney - McKenna Long & Aldridge
RICO Lawyer & Attorney - Thomas G. Walker
Railroad Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Cahill Goetsch & Perry Law Firm
Real Estate & Construction Lawyer & Attorney - Cole Schotz Law Firm
Real Estate, Construction Law Lawyer & Attorney - Sheppard Mullin
Renewable Energy Law Firm - Stoel Rives LLP
Robert Ambrogi - LawSites
Rockford Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Tim Whitham Law Firm
Sacramento Labor & Employment Lawyer & Attorney : Weintraub Genshlea Chediak Law Firm
Salt Lake City Advertising, Promotions & Privacy Lawyer & Attorney - St. George Offices of Jones Waldo Law Firm
San Antonio Injury Lawyer & Attorney - The McKinney Law Firm
San Antonio Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Lawyer & Attorney - McKinney Law Firm
San Diego Small Business Lawyer & Attorney - Joseph Dang Law Firm
San Francisco Auto Accident Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Todd P. Emanuel Law Firm
Seattle & New Orleans Lawyer & Attorney - Wolfe Law Group
Seattle Insurance Lawyer & Attorney - Williams Kastner Law Firm
Seattle Legal Marketing Blog - Sogn Consulting
Seattle Startup Company Lawyer & Attorney - Davis Wright Tremaine Law Firm
Securities Regulation & Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Lindquist & Vennum
Security & Privacy Lawyer & Attorney - Foley Hoag Law Firm
Self-Help Law, Limited Legal Services - MyLawyer.com
Semiconductor Lawyer & Attorney - Perkins Coie Law Firm
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Insight & Commentary - Kelley Drye & Warren Law Firm
South Carolina Child Advocacy Lawyer & Attorney - R. Michael Ethridge
South Carolina Immigration Lawyer & Attorney - Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair
South Carolina Injury Lawyer - David Swanner
South Carolina Nursing Home Lawyer & Attorney - Poliakoff & Associates Law Firm
South Carolina Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Trey Mills
Southern California Insurance Lawyer & Attorney - Gauntlett Law Firm
Spartanburg Divorce Lawyer & Attorney - Stevens-MacPhail Law Firm
Springfield Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Jason Krebs Law Firm
St. Louis Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Aaron Farmer
Stark County Law Library Blawg
State Bar of Texas Blog - News & Updates for Lawyers & Legal Professionals
Super Lawyers Blog - Bill White
Supreme Court of Washington Blog - Evergreen Freedom Foundation
Surrogacy and Egg Donation Lawyer & Attorney - Theresa Erickson
TaxProf Blog - Paul Caron
Tech Law Advisor - Kevin Heller
Technology Law & Legal Technology - Dennis Kennedy
Technology Law Lawyers & Attorneys - Thelen Reid Law Firm
Technology and Digital Media Lawyer & Attorney - Davis Wright Tremaine
Telecom Law - Davis Wright Tremaine
Tennessee Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Branham & Day
Tennessee Injury Lawyer & Attorney - John Day
Tennessee Medical Malpractice Lawyer & Attorney - Branham & Day
Texas Appeals Lawyer & Attorney - D. Todd Smith Law Firm
Texas Appellate Lawyer & Attorney - Cowles & Thompson Law Firm
Texas Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Aaron Ramirez Law Firm
Texas Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Rob Radcliff Law Firm
Texas Financial Services Lawyer & Attorney - Winstead Law Firm
Texas Forensic Evidence Lawyer & Attorney - Cliff Hutchinson
Texas Horse and Equine Lawyer & Attorney - Alison Rowe Law Firm
Texas Immigration Lawyer & Attorney - Kraft & Associates Law Firm
Texas Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Allen Rogers Law Firm
Texas Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Bailey Law Firm
Texas Internet, Information Technology & E-Discovery Lawyer & Attorney Peter S. Vogel - Gardere Wynne Sewell Law Firm
Texas Lawyer & Attorney Recruiter - Courtney Sapire
Texas Litigation Law Firm - Heygood, Orr, Reyes & Bartolomei
Texas Medical Licensing Lawyer & Attorney - Leichter Law Firm
Texas Tax Lawyer & Attorney - Alan E. Sherman
Texas Wind Energy Tax Lawyer & Attorney - Sprouse Schrader Law Firm
Texas Workers Compensation Lawyer & Attorney - John Gibson Law Firm
The Legal Reader - John Hoar
The Mac Lawyer: Using Macs In the Practice Of Law - Ben Stevens
Toronto Estate Lawyer - Hull & Hull Law Firm
Toxic Tort Lawyer & Attorney - Epstein Becker & Green Law Firm
Trade Secrets Lawyers & Attorneys - Seyfarth Shaw Law Firm
Truck Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Morgan Adams
Tucson Land Use Lawyer & Attorney - Fleishman Law Firm
Twin Cities Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Gavin P. Craig Law Firm
University of Houston Law Center Faculty Blog
Utah Business Law Lawyer & Attorney - Strong and Hanni Law Firm
Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Gregory Stevens
Utah DUI Lawyer & Attorney - Glen W. Neeley
Utah Divorce and Family Lawyer & Attorney - Gregory Stevens
Utah Insurance Lawyer & Attorney - Strong and Hanni Law Firm
Virgin Islands Lawyer & Attorney - Tom Bolt & Associates
Virginia Condominium & Homeowners Association Lawyer - Inman & Strickler
Virginia Intellectual Property Lawyer & Attorney - Troutman Sanders Law Firm
Waco Criminal Lawyer & Attorney - Walter Reaves Law Firm
Wage & Hour Lawyer & Attorney - Littler Mendelson Law Firm
Wage and Hour Lawyer & Attorney - Yezbak Law Offices
Washington & Oregon Construction Defect Lawyer & Attorney - Barker Martin Law Firm
Washington Construction Lawyer & Attorney - Davis Wright Tremaine
Washington D.C. Advertising Lawyer & Attorney - Kelley Drye & Warren Law Firm
Washington D.C. Class Action Lawyer & Attorney - Steven Berk Law Firm
Washington D.C. Employment Lawyer & Attorney - Littler Mendelson Law Firm
Washington D.C. Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Gabriel Assaad Law Firm
Washington DC Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Garrow & Evans
Washington Medical Malpractice Lawyer & Attorney - Regan Zambri & Long
Washington Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney - Regan Zambri & Long
Washington State DWI Lawyer & Attorney - Fox Bowman Duarte
Washington State Trial Law & Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Robert M. Boggs
Washington Traffic Lawyer & Attorney - Jon Zimmerman
West Virigina Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Jeffrey V. Mehalic
Whistleblower Lawyer & Attorney - LaBovick & LaBovick
Whistleblower Lawyer & Attorney - National Whistleblower Legal Defense and Education Fund
Wisconsin Business Litigation Lawyer & Attorney - Schober Schober & Mitchell Law Firm
Wisconsin Truck Accident Lawyer & Attorney - Rozek Law Offices
Youth Serving Lawyer & Attorney - Debbie Ausburn
eLawyering & Online Legal Services - DirectLaw
legal sanity - Arnie Herz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs 2.5 License. -->
Toronto Estate Law Blog
Hull & Hull LLP
Toronto Office | 141 Adelaide St. West, Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3L5
Phone: 416.369.1140, Fax: 416.369.1517
Oakville Office | 228 Lakeshore Rd. East, Oakville, Ontario, L6J 5A2 Phone: 905.844.2383, Fax: 905.844.3 Toronto Law Firm Hull & Hull providing services related to wills, trusts, succession planning, estate litigation, guardianship, will drafting, estate mediation and planning to the province of Ontario including London, Brampton, Markham, Windsor, Kitchener, and Vaughan. Privacy Policy
Disclaimer